Actual Issues of Women's Health

Editor-in-Chief of the magazine
Doctor of Medical Sciences, Professor

Yu. E. Dobrokhotova

Подписаться на журнал
Подписка на журнал "Актуальные вопросы женского здоровья"
Dear friends and dear colleagues!


We are glad to welcome you to the pages of the scientific and practical peer-reviewed journal "Actual Issues of Women's Health".

The issue of our journal is the result of many years of fruitful scientific work in the field of obstetrics, gynecology and perinatology.

All published articles will be based on modern principles of evidence-based medicine and a personalized approach to the management of our patients.

Today our journal is faced with the difficult tasks of updating the most important unsolved problems and finding possible ways to solve them.

We hope that the magazine "Topical Issues of Women's Health" will become a source of interesting and useful professional information for you.

We invite you to cooperate, dear colleagues, both as authors of the magazine and as its readers, but most importantly, as friends! For we all do one big and very good deed - we restore health to our patients, give them and their families hope for a long happy life, in which there should be as little illness and sorrow as possible, and as much joy and fun as possible.

I wish all authors and readers of the journal creative success in research and new achievements on the way to scientific discoveries!


The circulation of the magazine is 18,000 copies.

Exit - 2 times a year.

Sincerely,
Chief Editor
Doctor of Medical Sciences, Professor
Yu. E. Dobrokhotova

Редакционная коллегия
Боровкова Екатерина Игоревна
д.м.н., профессор кафедры акушерства и гинекологии л/ф ФГАОУ ВО РНИМУ им. Н.И. Пирогова МЗ РФ
Вартанян Эмма Врамовна
д.м.н., глав врач клиники «Эммаклиник»
Гришин Игорь Игоревич
д.м.н., профессор кафедры акушерства и гинекологии л/ф ФГАОУ ВО РНИМУ им. Н.И. Пирогова МЗ РФ
Ильина Ирина Юрьевна
д.м.н., профессор кафедры акушерства и гинекологии л/ф ФГАОУ ВО РНИМУ им. Н.И. Пирогова МЗ РФ
Керчелаева Светлана Борисовна
д.м.н., профессор кафедры акушерства и гинекологии л/ф ФГАОУ ВО РНИМУ им. Н.И. Пирогова МЗ РФ
Козлов Павел Васильевич
д.м.н., профессор кафедры акушерства и гинекологии л/ф ФГАОУ ВО РНИМУ им. Н.И. Пирогова МЗ РФ
Озолиня Людмила Анатольевна
д.м.н., профессор кафедры акушерства и гинекологии л/ф ФГАОУ ВО РНИМУ им. Н.И. Пирогова МЗ РФ
Паяниди Юлия Геннадьевна
д.м.н., старший научный сотрудник НМИЦ онкологии им. Н.Н. Блохина
Савченко Татьяна Николаевна
д.м.н., профессор кафедры акушерства и гинекологии л/ф ФГАОУ ВО РНИМУ им. Н.И. Пирогова МЗ РФ
Хашукоева Асият Зульчифовна
д.м.н., профессор кафедры акушерства и гинекологии л/ф ФГАОУ ВО РНИМУ им. Н.И. Пирогова МЗ РФ
Венедиктова Марина Георгиевна
д.м.н., профессор кафедры акушерства и гинекологии л/ф ФГАОУ ВО РНИМУ им. Н.И. Пирогова МЗ РФ
ORDER OF REFERRAL, REVIEW AND
PUBLICATION OF SCIENTIFIC ARTICLES,
received by the editorial office
"Topical issues of women's health"

1. A reviewer who previously agreed to cooperate with the journal receives an email with a request to review the manuscript in accordance with his scientific profile. The following information is included in the letter:
- title, abstract, key words of the manuscript;
- the date by which it is necessary to send a response to the editor about the consent or refusal to review the manuscript.
2. The consent of the reviewer to cooperate with the journal implies agreement with the Regulations on Peer Review, as well as with the rules and standards of editorial ethics, which the journal "Actual Issues of Women's Health" adheres to in its work.
If the reviewer does not agree with these or those rules adopted in the journal, please inform the editor-in-chief about this before starting the reviewing procedure.
3. Reviewing is carried out on a voluntary basis. If the manuscript corresponds to the field of scientific interests of the reviewer, he has the time and desire to complete this work, the reviewer agrees to prepare a review of the manuscript.
4. After obtaining consent, the reviewer is sent the full text of the manuscript and the review template.
5. When evaluating the manuscript, the editorial board asks to evaluate the following parameters: correspondence of the subject of the article to the subject of the journal; information content and sufficiency of the abstract of the article; novelty and significance of the results; the validity and correctness of the application of the methods used in the study; correspondence of the results obtained to the goals and objectives of the study; sufficiency and completeness of citation of literature on the research topic; sufficiency and justification of illustrative material and tables; correctness of the form and style of presentation of the material.
6. In conclusion, the editorial board asks for a recommendation (with a brief justification):
- to recommend the manuscript for publication in the presented form (without comments);
- to recommend the manuscript for publication with minor (technical) corrections;
- to recommend the manuscript for publication after substantial revision;
- the manuscript needs additional reviewing by another specialist;
- reject the manuscript.
7. If the review contains recommendations for correcting and revising the article, the executive secretary sends the author a copy of the review text with a proposal to take them into account when editing the manuscript or reasonably (partially or completely) refute them, and the editorial board of the journal undertakes to send copies of the reviews to the Ministry of Education and Science Of the Russian Federation upon receipt of the corresponding request to the editorial office of the publication.
8. The manuscript, revised by the author in accordance with the comments received, or a letter with a reasoned refusal to correct them, are sent for review to the same reviewer who made the critical comments. Also, the author of the article has the right to contact the editorial office of the journal with a reasoned request to send his manuscript to another reviewer.
9. The reviewer re-evaluates the article taking into account the changes made or a reasoned refusal to eliminate them.
10. Correspondence between the author and the reviewer is conducted through the executive secretary of the editorial board.
11. The accepted term for reviewing the manuscript is no more than a month. At the request of the reviewer, this period can be extended by agreement with the editorial board.
12. Reviews are stored in the archive of the editorial office for 5 (five) years from the date of their signing by the reviewer.
Подписаться
Заполните форму обратной связи и подпишитесь на свежие новости
Заполняя данную форму, вы подтверждаете, что ознакомлены с политикой конфиденциальности нашего сайта
Menu
Contacts
Moscow, Podolsky Cadets str., building 3, p. 2, floor 3, room No. 35
Created by Eclipse-AD
Certificate of registration of an Internet resource in the media with the number ЭЛ_ФС 77-81778 от 27.08.2021
Made on
Tilda